Erik/(a \/Lu
st cha`llenge*s and disman\$tles `soci #ety's `\.d?.ivi ]de/: betwe^en se$x# :and parentin+g. T $iffany Doll and her husba\nd _(Bruno,,@ a .? rea/l-li/,fe couple a nd parent\s,
(
star #`:in her la@($tes#t s@`\[ex? documenta_ry, which i@+nvestiga_tes and de)+)_co(`ns/
`tructs soci=;et
.
y's duality @between sex+ and mothe.rhood. Why do\
/( we consider t_!hese t`wo th!/ings .;to * )b/e= so inc) ompatible ,,^+ ,despite the fact, %tha)^% t pr_?egnanc#(y is a completely normal condition bo.r_,_n of sex? Why
dep_=r
ive pregnant [women the opportunity to be r%+egarded as sex;ual b
_;]ein]gs\ during this ex,
citing moment\ in their* lives
? E*(\*rika Lust asks for =?:the[ []+detabooi(zation of intercour+#se #^ _du/ring pregn*anc^:y and tackles the- ab_sence o;f discus()/si^\/on and pr^oper inf-=ormation, wh
ic# !h even=/tually,;: lead t `^o damaging bel/iefs) an^d stigmatization of sex.